“Wastin’ away again in Margaritaville…” is a well-known Jimmy Buffett song and who would have guessed “wastin away” would have a different meaning since his passing.
Buffett built a life around freedom—working hard, enjoying it, and leaving something meaningful behind for the people he loved.
Which makes what’s happening now hard to ignore.
His $275 million estate is tied up in court. It’s being challenged, delayed, and picked apart inside a system that moves slowly and charges by the hour. And as that process plays out, the expenses are being paid out of the generational wealth he intended to leave his family.
Battle over $275M Jimmy Buffett estate heads to Florida appeals court
If that can happen at $275 million, it’s not a stretch to ask what happens everywhere else.
Because this isn’t just a celebrity headline. It’s something we are seeing more and more—families pulled into probate fights, even when they thought they had everything handled. It’s one of the reasons we’ve been pushing so hard on probate and guardianship issues and bringing those concerns forward, including outreach to Senator Rick Scott’s office.
What we’re seeing isn’t a fluke.
It’s a pattern.
I came across a video this week (fair warning—the language is rough) where Vanilla Ice says something most people don’t say out loud. He questions whether it makes sense to put everything into “legal government” structures that can be challenged, delayed, and ultimately controlled by the system.
Instead, he suggests thinking about what can be kept outside of it. Here is the full video but you can start at 11:00 to hear about death taxes, etc.
That’s where something as simple—and overlooked—as insurance comes into play. Not as a replacement for planning, but as a way to create a lane that doesn’t depend on court timelines, disputes, or who decides to challenge what. When structured properly, it goes where it’s supposed to go—directly to your family or others you loved —without waiting for permission.
It’s not flashy. But it’s effective.
None of this means planning doesn’t matter. It does. But it does mean we should stop assuming that a well-written plan guarantees a smooth outcome.
Because right now, that assumption is costing families more than they realize.
If a $275 million estate can get pulled into the system and slowly chipped away…
It’s not a question of whether the system works.
It’s a question of who it works for.
NOTE: Eye encourages our readers to do your research, contact your insurance broker and see if they have products that might work for you and your family. It may be old fashioned but maybe old fashioned is what we need in these new systems that seem to work for lawyers and judges while your assets waste away in a courtroom.








4 responses to ““Wastin’ Away in Probateville… An old idea might help you”
Billie, Any idea why the State needs a “Registry” of residents with Parkinsonism? Just curious if you had seen that. I guess next they will want one of cancer and diabetes.
I have not heard about that. Can you send me info? We will find out more.
I found it – https://flhouse.gov/Sections/Bills/billsdetail.aspx?BillId=84190
We will see what’s up with this. Thanks for bringing to our attention
From Dr. O’Leary who is a writer for Eye – I don’t think there is a strong story here as the State of FL already has numerous registries, including:
• Birth defects
• Cancer registry
• Communicable diseases
• Stroke
• Medical Marijuana
and others.
The registry uses de-identified data and allows patients to opt out of the database. It should allow patients to opt in and give their consent.
Given that there are already multiple registries, this bill will pass. UFS isn’t a powerhouse in Parkinson’s research, and the bill’s intent may be to strengthen the university.
In short, the intent seems to be to further research into this terrible disease. I understand the privacy concerns; however, states can legislate registries as long as the information is not searchable by the public.