The O-Biden scheme to effectuate “replacement migration” by shredding our immigration laws to import and distribute tens of millions of illegal aliens – unvetted ones at that – throughout our homeland was, to my mind a textbook case of treason. It’s safe to say that I’m not alone in my conclusion.
Speaking of not alone, that “replacement migration” example of treason under O-Biden is but one a many potential examples – and, in turn, numerous individuals and organizations beyond O-Biden are likewise culpable (e.g., numerous NGO’s residing amongst culpable).
But for the present discussion, let’s just focus on the example of the illegal alien invasion. This because, since President Trump assumed office, stopping his efforts toward undoing the damage of that invasion has probably been the single greatest target of Democrat / Left lawfare (albeit, with their lawfare targeting DOGE and the efforts at “right-sizing” the federal government coming close behind).
Well, if the underlying commission of the invasion constitutes treason, then must that not also be said of organized and coordinated efforts to “protect and preserve” the results of those treasonous acts? And so those working toward same becoming themselves (at a minimum) traitors after-the-fact … accessories to treason?
And what of the coordination by and amongst folks such as Norm Eisen and Democracy Defenders Action and the ACLU? Does the phrase “RICO” not come to mind?
From O-Biden on down through the NGO’s and litigants, they might attempt to mask their actions as “protecting due process” or “civil rights.” But this falls apart when we consider the intended result(s) of the invasion – which in essence was a coupling of “The Cloward-Piven Strategy” with the U.N.’s schemes for “replacement migration.”
That is, importing a “critical mass” of people with no historical or cultural ties to the targeted nation state, thus culturally and electorally displacing a country’s native population and setting the stage for subsuming the targeted nation state under a “global governance” regime.
In other words, overthrowing the United States of America as a free and sovereign nation.
If that doesn’t constitute treason, then what does?
And if working to preserve and protect existing advances of treason – i.e., coordinating and executing a blanket lawfare operation against a MAGA President and his administration, which is trying to remove the replacement migrants from our shores – doesn’t constitute treason, then what does?
