DeSantis hosts COVID Grand Jury Roundtable

The panel included expert scientists like Dr. Joseph Fraiman, Dr. Steven Templeton, Dr. Brett Weinstein, Dr. Martin Kulldorf, and Dr. Jay Bhattacharya.

There’s a ton of good stuff in the program, which runs just over an hour (1:11:00). The scientists focused more than anything on the failures of the big, federal health agencies.

For flavor, Dr. Bhattacharya began his comments criticizing the agencies that ignored the Grand Jury’s information requests and praising the report (lightly edited):

It is vital we have a conversation over the errors made during the pandemic… we need to establish a principle that we never lock down again. The Report highlights on the topic of masks how fundamentally agencies like the CDC ignored basic science, used their power to silence disagreeing scientists, and submerged reliance on high-quality evidence.

We need to figure out ways that these agencies that engaged in this sort of pseudo-scientific thinking are reformed. The Report does a good job of highlighting and starting that conversation.

Back in the day, whenever Governor DeSantis held one of these conferences, it was right before he was about to take some controversial action. For example, I think his very first online scientific panel was held right before he canceled lockdowns.

The Governor did the same thing just before he issued executive orders banning mask mandates.

The goal of these panels was to delete media’s ability to complain that Governor DeSantis wasn’t “following the science.” After all, he’d just asked a bunch of scientists for advice. The other side, the pro-masking, pro-lockdowners, were not holding similar panels online with public officials. Had they done so, we could have held a debate.

I’m tempted to hope the Governor is about to do something big, a move that this panel, which heavily criticized the federal health agencies, was helping establish a foundation for. But it could also be the Governor was just defending the Grand Jury’s initial report from criticisms that it didn’t go far enough.

If nothing else, this panel highlighted the Jurors’ conclusions and moved the covid football a little bit further downfield toward the end zone of accountability.

We’ll be waiting to find out what this week brings.

Jeff Childers

Jeff Childers is the president and founder of the Childers Law firm. Jeff interned at the Federal Bankruptcy Court in Orlando, where he helped write several widely-cited opinions. He then worked as an associate with the prestigious firm of Winderweedle, Haines, Ward & Woodman in Orlando and Winter Park, Florida before moving back to Gainesville and founding Childers Law. Jeff served for three years on the Board of Directors of the Central Florida Bankruptcy Law Association. He has also served on the Board of Directors of the Eighth Judicial Bar Association, and on the Rules Committee for the Northern District of Florida Bankruptcy Court. Jeff has published several articles as co-author with Professor William Page of the Levin College of Law (University of Florida) on the topic of anti-trust in the Microsoft case. He also is the author of an article on the topic of Product Liability in the Software Context. Jeff focuses his area of practice on commercial litigation, elections law, and constitutional issues. He is a skilled trial litigator and appellate advocate. http://www.coffeeandcovid.com/

Comments

Post Your Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *