NOTE from Billie Tucker Volpe — I read the following article on social media and I immediately thought of Jacksonville’s two latest mayors – Lenny Curry (Republican) and Donna Deegan (Democrat). Both Mayors took down confederate monuments and successfully erased history because they needed to appease certain people in the Jacksonville community. Even one of our local high schools had to undergo a name change because it honored Robert E. Lee. We knew it was wrong and many people fought it – to no avail. This article explains how that was just the tip of the spear of what we are watching today. Please take time to read it and understand that no matter what monuments politicians topple – history can never be erased. It will somehow show up because truth always does.
This article was written by Mindy Wilcoxen Esposito, a happily married grandmother, Confederate advocate and the founder of Southern Independence Association.
THE FIRST ERASURE: HOW CONFEDERATE MEMORY BECAME THE BLUEPRINT FOR AMERICA’S CULTURAL REVOLUTION
In recent years, Americans have struggled to understand how their nation, long anchored by shared history, faith, and civic identity, could suddenly feel unmoored. Retired Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn’s assessment of an attempted cultural revolution explains much of this turmoil. But when viewed through the lens of Southern history, a deeper truth becomes clear: Confederate memory was not only an early casualty of this ideological struggle, it was the proving ground.
Long before the nation realized what was happening, Southern monuments, graves, flags, and historical narratives were quietly placed under assault. What seemed at first like isolated controversies were in fact early experiments in coercion, censorship, and the rewriting of memory. The destruction of Confederate heritage was the pilot program for a much larger transformation. The revolutionaries learned on the South what they later unleashed on the whole Republic.
I. Confederate History as the First Test Case
The American cultural revolution could not succeed without first weakening the nation’s historical foundations. Crucially, Confederate memory offered a politically convenient target, safe to attack, unlikely to trigger broad institutional resistance, and rich with symbolic power.
Decades before the wider public felt the pressure of ideological enforcement, Confederate symbols were:
removed under cover of darkness,
vandalized without consequence,
stripped of historical nuance, and
recast as badges of collective guilt rather than memorials to the dead.
Anyone who questioned this narrative, historians, descendants, preservationists, found themselves smeared, silenced, or socially punished. What Flynn calls “behavioral conditioning” was practiced first on Southerners. If society could be trained to accept the erasure of one region’s history, activists reasoned, the rest of America would follow in time.
They were right.
II. A Nation That Forgets One Past Can Forget Any Past
Once Confederate memory was successfully recoded as shameful, the ideological project expanded outward with remarkable speed. Monuments to Washington, Jefferson, Lincoln, Columbus, and even Union generals were suddenly “problematic.” The Declaration of Independence became suspect. The Constitution was recast as an artifact of oppression. School curricula replaced civic literacy with grievance narratives.
What began with the Confederacy was never just about the Confederacy. It was about whether Americans could be persuaded to sever themselves from their own history.
The architects of this revolution understood something simple and chilling:
A people who are taught to hate their past can be made to surrender their future.
III. Red Washing: How a Nation’s Memory Was Rewritten
Flynn’s term “red washing” describes the deletion, distortion, and replacement of historical memory; precisely what Confederate descendants witnessed long before the nation awakened to it.
For years, textbooks quietly shifted. Museums changed language. University departments reclassified American and Southern history as political battlegrounds. Stories of courage, faith, sacrifice, community, and reconciliation were buried beneath ideological narratives that served a modern agenda rather than truth.
By the time the public realized how radically history had been rewritten, entire generations had already been taught:
not what happened,
but what they were supposed to feel about it.
This was the revolution’s most powerful weapon.
IV. Suppressing Southern Heritage Was a Trial Run for Suppressing American Identity
Flynn describes the cultural revolution as a coordinated alliance between bureaucracies, activist networks, and media institutions. Nowhere was this alliance more boldly displayed than in the treatment of Confederate heritage.
The South became a controlled environment where the ideological project measured:
how much dissent people would tolerate,
how quickly institutions would comply,
how aggressively media could shape narratives,
how forcefully public symbols could be removed.
When the experiment succeeded, when monuments fell quietly and opposition was muted, the blueprint was expanded nationwide.
The targeting of the Confederacy was not the end goal; it was the gateway.
V. The Stakes: A Nation’s Soul
The erasure of memory is not simply academic. It affects how we understand liberty, duty, sacrifice, and identity. Confederate dead were once honored as American soldiers who fought bravely for their homes, respected even by their former enemies. To recast them as villains was to sever a sacred thread of national reconciliation.
And once that thread was cut, all of American memory became vulnerable.
The Founders, frontiersmen, pioneers, soldiers, inventors and every figure who once formed the backbone of our civic story, became fair game.
VI. What the South Knew First, America Knows Now
For decades, Southerners warned that if history could be erased for one group, it could be erased for all. Today, the nation is waking up to that truth. Americans of every region now feel pressures once experienced almost exclusively by descendants of Confederate families:
censorship,
social punishment,
coerced conformity,
fear of speaking openly,
rewriting of the national story.
The South was not the outlier. It was the early warning system.
VII. The Path Forward
If Flynn is correct, and many believe he is, the cultural revolution has fractured, but not vanished. Its project has been slowed but not defeated. The restoration of American civic life begins with reclaiming memory: understanding, teaching, and preserving the truth of our past so that future generations cannot be cut off from it.
Confederate history is part of that restoration, not only for the South but for the nation as a whole. It embodies principles the revolution sought to erase:
honor for the dead,
reverence for ancestors,
fidelity to local identity,
resistance to centralized coercion,
courage in the face of overwhelming power.
These values are not sectional. They are American.
And they are worth defending.
*****
CITATIONS & SOURCES
I. Historical Erasure, Memory Rewriting, and Ideological Use of History
Lowenthal, David. The Past Is a Foreign Country – Revisited. Cambridge University Press, 2015.
— Definitive scholarly work on how societies reshape and erase historical memory for political purposes.
Hobsbawm, Eric, and Terence Ranger, eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge University Press, 1983.
— Seminal study showing how political groups create or overwrite historical narratives.
Banner, James M. Jr. The Ever-Changing Past: Why All History Is Revisionist History. Yale University Press, 2021.
— Explains how history is routinely reframed for political ends.
Upton, Dell. What Can and Can’t Be Said: Race, Uplift, and Monument Building in the Contemporary South. Yale University Press, 2015.
— Documents coordinated campaigns to reinterpret or remove Confederate monuments.
“The War Over Confederate Monuments.” Smithsonian Magazine, Aug. 2017.
— Shows institutional and activist alignment in reframing Southern history.
—
II. Institutional Capture, Bureaucratic Ideology, and Government Overreach
“Review of DHS Intelligence Reports.” Office of Inspector General, Department of Homeland Security, Report OIG-22-91, 2022.
— Documents ideological bias and improper internal training within DHS.
“Political Activities of Federal Employees.” Government Accountability Office (GAO), 2020.
— Identifies patterns of improper political influence inside federal agencies.
The Twitter Files.
Independent investigative reporting (2022–2023) led by Matt Taibbi, Bari Weiss, and Michael Shellenberger.
— Documents coordination between federal agencies and social-media companies on political content moderation.
Church Committee Reports (Final Report). U.S. Senate Select Committee to Study Governmental Operations with Respect to Intelligence Activities, 1976.
— Historic evidence of federal agencies surveilling citizens based on ideology.
—
III. DEI as a Mechanism of Coercion or Compelled Ideology
Meriwether v. Shawnee State University. 992 F.3d 492 (6th Cir. 2021).
— Federal court ruling that DEI policies cannot compel ideological speech.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. Novant Health Settlements, 2022–2024.
— Shows instances where DEI was used improperly in employment decisions.
Rufo, Christopher F. America’s Cultural Revolution: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything. Broadside Books, 2023.
— Documents DEI training systems, activist staff pipelines, and ideological conformity pressures in government, corporate, and academic institutions.
“The Rise of Mandatory DEI Trainings.” Wall Street Journal, 2021–2024 series.
— Investigative reporting on coercive or ideologically driven DEI mandates.
—
IV. Evidence of Government Surveillance or Targeting of Ideological Groups
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration. Inappropriate Criteria Were Used to Identify Tax-Exempt Applications for Review. 2013.
— The IRS targeting scandal (Tea Party and conservative groups).
FBI Richmond Field Office. Domestic Terrorism: Radical Traditionalist Catholics Memo, Jan. 2023 (withdrawn).
— Direct evidence of ideological profiling inside the FBI.
National School Boards Association Letter to DOJ, September 2021 and subsequent DOJ communications.
— Shows federal involvement in labeling parent dissent as domestic extremism.
—
V. Coordinated Activist Networks, Funding Streams, and Narrative Alignment
Gurri, Martin. The Revolt of the Public and the Crisis of Authority in the New Millennium. Stripe Press, 2014.
— Explores how activist networks reshape political structures and public narratives.
Fisher, Dana. American Resistance: From the Women’s March to the Blue Wave. Columbia University Press, 2019.
— Academic documentation of interconnected activist networks, overlapping staff, and coordinated messaging.
Capital Research Center Investigative Reports (2018–2024).
— Maps funding networks linking activist organizations across racial justice, environmental, feminist, and anti-police movements.
“How Philanthropy Shapes Progressive Activism.” The New York Times, May 2021.
— Documents shared donors, staff, and organizational overlap across multiple ideological movements.
—
VI. Memory Suppression and Ideological Reframing in Education
Stanford University. History Wars and the Classroom: Democratic Ideas in Conflict, 2018.
— Documents how historical curricula shifted toward ideology-driven narratives.
National Association of Scholars. The 1619 Project: A Critique, 2020–2022.
— Demonstrates factual distortions and ideological intent in rewriting American history.
RAND Corporation. The Ideological Exposure in K–12 Education Report, 2021.
— Shows coordinated ideological shifts in school curricula.
Schaefer, Elizabeth. “Confederate Memory in the Classroom.” Journal of Southern History, vol. 85, no. 3, 2019.
— Academic analysis of how Southern history has been selectively erased or reframed.
