Let me begin with Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY), who was idly cloud-gazing yesterday, minding his own business, when he felt compelled to tweet this curious observation:
Clouds sure take some funny shapes! These days. I’m old enough to remember back when they were shaped like elephants, sharks, dinosaurs, and roses. Good times.
Moving next to weird, ‘extreme hail’ weather news, Yahoo News ran a story yesterday headlined, “Strange ‘Hail Flow’ in Nebraska Goes Viral.” It’s alive!
CLIP: Weird, blob-like hail “lava flow” in Scottsbluff, Nebraska (1:09).
Whatever that is, I’m just glad it wasn’t in my yard.
Next, what the hail? I never even considered this awful risk arising from gorilla hail. I bet these passengers had a memorable travel experience:
Who knows? I’m sure this kind of weather happens all the time, but I’ve never seen hail lava or airplane hail-abuse before.
Finally, yesterday the UK Guardian confirmed another conspiracy theory when it ran its incendiary headline, “Climate engineering off US coast could increase heatwaves in Europe, study finds.” Uh oh.
The story tracked a study published just yesterday in the Journal Nature (Climate Change), titled “Diminished efficacy of regional marine cloud brightening in a warmer world – Nature Climate Change. The study’s researchers were the same unlucky crew blasting some kind of salt into the air right off San Fransisco, before alarmed local officials got wind of the ‘experiment’ and pulled the plug.
Essentially, the scientists, having been caught with their salt-stained fingers in the weather modification jar, have concluded never mind:
Marine cloud brightening (MCB) is a geoengineering proposal to cool atmospheric temperatures and reduce climate change impacts. Under present-day conditions, we find MCB reduces the relative risk of dangerous summer heat exposure by 55% and 16%, respectively. However, the same interventions under mid-century warming minimally reduce or even increase heat stress in the Western United States and across the world.
Our result demonstrates a risk in assuming that interventions effective under certain conditions will remain effective as the climate continues to change.
The Guardian article also mentioned, offhand, that oh yeah, Australian scientists have also been using “marine cloud brightening strategies” for at least four years now, cooling the Great Barrier Reef to reduce coral bleaching.
But they would never ever do it near you.
The gist — try to follow the logic here — was the researchers said their “models” showed that weather modification in one part of the world might cool that part, but it could also heat up a different part of the world, like Europe, which let’s be honest, who cares.
But — now they were caught red-handed, or white-handed, whichever — the lead scientist is now suddenly calling for government regulation of weather modification, which until ten seconds ago was just a fake news conspiracy theory on TikTok:
Jessica Wan, part of the research team led by UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography, said, “It shows that marine cloud brightening can be very effective for the US west coast if done now, but it may be ineffective there in the future and could cause heatwaves in Europe.”
She said the results should prompt policymakers to establish governance structures and transparency guidelines, not just on a global level but regionally.
“There is really no solar geoengineering governance right now. That is scary. Science and policy need to be developed together,” she said. “We don’t want to be in a situation where one region is forced to do geoengineering to combat what another part of the world has done to respond to droughts and heatwaves.”
It’s not chemtrails, dummy, it’s solar geoengineering. Which is totally different.
So, basically, the study admitted that scientists have learned how, in theory, to create a heat wave in Europe by spraying chemicals into the air in San Fransisco. Heat waves can cause wildfires, which can cause destabilization. What else did the scientists learn? What didn’t make it into the published study?
In the Guardian’s article, as in every other article following the unexpected disclosure of the San Fransisco project, salt-blinded journalists failed to ask the most important question that every single reader wants to know: Where else in the world are they testing weather modification technologies by spraying chemicals into the air?
Besides chemtrails and salt sprayers, what other kinds of ‘solar geoengineering’ are going on?
Finally, are they doing it right now, over Gainesville?
The Guardian informed us that the entire weather modification field is completely unregulated, so you can’t say it is illegal. Bill Gates, or Bill Johnson for that matter, or anybody, can rent a boat or plane and spray whatever they want into the skies, pursuing whatever reckless experiment they can dream up trying to score a massive government climate change contract.
How many teams are doing it right now?
Some states, like Tennessee, have started banning geoengineering experiments, causing corporate media reporters and social media bots to laugh like adderall-fueled hyenas about all the stupid hicks and their ridiculous chemtrail conspiracy theories.
Coincidentally — I’m just pointing this out for context, don’t cancel me — chemtrail-denying corporate media is owned by the very same oligarchs and billionaires who are probably funding most of the weather modification projects in hopes of earning multi-billion-dollar government contracts. A weird coincidence!
Public-private partnerships, and so forth.
On that note, the salty experiment where the weather-modifying scientists were unexpectedly nabbed was being run on the flight deck of a decommissioned aircraft carrier, the U.S.S. Hornet, docked in Alameda in San Francisco Bay.
In other words, to whatever extent, the geoengineering researchers were working with the U.S. military.
No corporate media reporter has yet made the military connection. But you can be 100% sure our geopolitical enemies noticed. And unlike reporters, our enemies have probably looked into who the researchers are, who funded them, and what other stuff they are working on.
In other words, the new study may be a limited hangout aimed at pacifying enemies about what we were getting up to on that aircraft carrier in San Fransisco. It’s too risky, so we’re shutting it down. Trust us. And for the social media censors: I’m definitely not theorizing about any conspiracies. I’m not suggesting that the San Fransisco experiment was actually a military trial of a weather weapon that can be deployed from the decks of aircraft carriers or anything like that. What a ridiculous idea.
